Program Profiles
Program Profile1. Preliminary ProfileCompiled from published information and statistics which provide a programmatic overview in narrative form, the preliminary profile should include information on the number of faculty, the courses taught, the number of undergraduate, graduate, and post-doctoral students, a review of the patterns, if any, in the doctoral dissertations and masters theses, and the patterns, if any, in sponsored research. The preliminary profile represents the selector's judgment of what programmatic research and instructional emphasis exists now, a brief history of the program (from published sources), and the anticipated directions that both research and instructional responsibilities are expected to take in the future. The preliminary profile is circulated, as a draft, to the appropriate faculty on an individual basis just prior to the interview. 2. Discussion with the Dean, Chair, and Program Head The discussion with the dean and chair is primarily to ensure an understanding of the collection management program, to alert the administration that the faculty will be interviewed and to allay fears that the program may jeopardize resources heretofore allocated by the library. Essentially, the discussion should encourage the understanding that collection management is an attempt on the part of the library to enhance its ability to provide the materials and services needed by the academic program. Solicit support--quite often the dean and chair will write letters to the faculty encouraging cooperation. It would be a good idea to review the preliminary profile with the dean and the chair during the meeting. 3. Faculty Interviews Schedule and complete the faculty interviews. Complete the Faculty Profile Worksheets, insofar as the information is available (remember the database can be updated at any time), and forward the forms and interview write-ups, after they have been approved by the appropriate bibliographer, to the Associate Director for Collection Management. 4. Draft Program Profile Make a conflation of the faculty interviews and preliminary profile narratives. The resulting narrative is the Draft Program Profile. This profile, containing the selector's description of the current program, including judgments concerning the relative importance of particular research and instructional endeavors, will be circulated among the concerned faculty. Once approved by the concerned faculty, the department chair, the appropriate bibliographer, and the Associate Director for Collection Management, the Draft Program Profile becomes the Program Profile. This profile forms the basis upon which the selection guidelines will be defined. Selection GuidelinesSelection guidelines are directly related to the academic program needs. Since no library can build to the research level in all areas, it is the selector's responsibility to relate the published universe to the program profile, define needs and priorities, and recommend guidelines for developing the collections in all formats. It is the responsibility of the selector to encourage and welcome faculty communication concerning the research resource needs and to maintain the timeliness of the selection guidelines. Developmental Steps:
Evaluation Steps:
The Collection Management PolicyWith the approved program profile and selection guidelines, the selector is now ready to make the final judgments and to distill (the policy will be short) the gathered data into a publishable collection management policy for the academic program. The parts of the policy are as follows:
The policy will be distributed to the appropriate dean(s), chairs, and faculty following approval of the policy by the bibliographer in charge, the Associate Director for Collection Management, and the Director of Libraries. Upon faculty approval, the policy will be established |